Posted: May 10, 2011 | Author: Mike | Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Abortion, Catholic Social Teaching |
Fordham moral theology professor Charlie Camosy (a friend of MC and one of my former TAs) ran a great blog called “No Hidden Magenta” for a year and half before calling it quits last month. (He’s still interwebbing at catholicmoraltheology.com; check it out.)
His goal was to “bridge the polarized gap between ‘Red and Blue State’ groupthink,” arguing that our commonly assumed political divides are silly and deeply flawed, especially from a Catholic perspective.
An approach to politics inspired by the Gospel as opposed to the other way around can and should lead a Catholic to hold views that don’t fit neatly into the traditional Left-Right spectrum (pro-life and pro-comprehensive immigration reform, for instance). We’re not quite red, we’re not quite blue…we’re more like magenta.

In Charlie’s absence, MC will take it upon itself from time to time to report on some interesting magenta news. We think this is a fitting enterprise for us because so many of our Catholic (and non-Catholic) peers are a sort of magenta in their political expressions. We’re more likely to be pro-life than our parents, but also more in favor of comprehensive immigration reform that is better at “welcoming the stranger” among us.
Two bits of magenta caught our attention this week:
1) Indiana congressman Joe Donnelly announced that he will run for Senate in 2012. Donnelly is a Catholic, pro-life Democrat. His immigration position could use some magenta-izing, but it’s an interesting development within a party that has been so traditionally pro-choice. Bob Casey and Ben Nelson are the only current pro-life Democratic Senators; Donnelly and Virginia candidate Tim Kaine could potentially double that number in 2012. Donnelly is more firmly pro-life than Kaine. (There is, of course, magenta on both sides of the aisle; see former Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel’s opposition to the Iraq War or current House Rep Chris Smith from NJ’s staunch human rights defense for some good examples.)
2) In response to President Obama’s call for comprehensive immigration reform on Tuesday, Archbishop Jose H. Gomez of Los Angeles called on the President and Congress to take action. It’s strong enough to be included here in full:
Archbishop Jose H. Gomez of Los Angeles, chairman of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) Committee on Migration, today urged the President and the Congress to work together to enact comprehensive immigration reform legislation.
Archbishop Gomez made his remarks following an address on immigration reform delivered this afternoon in El Paso, Texas, by President Obama on immigration reform.
“The president and Congress can no longer wait to address this important issue,” Archbishop Gomez said. “In the absence of comprehensive reform, many states and localities are taking the responsibility of enforcing immigration law into their own hands. This has led to abuses and injustices for many U.S. families and immigrant communities.”
The USCCB has consistently advocated for comprehensive reform of U.S. immigration policies that secures U.S. borders and gives undocumented immigrants the chance to earn permanent residency and eventual citizenship.
Archbishop Gomez said that any comprehensive reform must include a path for currently undocumented immigrants to earn citizenship. He repeated the bishops’ call for an end to federal enforcement policies that are harmful to families.
“Our current policies are breaking up families in the name of enforcing our laws. That should not be. We should be reuniting and strengthening families — not separating wives from husbands and children from their parents.”
Archbishop Gomez said that immigration reform is long overdue and requires bipartisan cooperation and leadership.
“Congress and the President have a responsibility to come together to enact reform that corrects this humanitarian problem, respects the dignity and hard work of our immigrant brothers and sisters, and reflects America’s proud history as a hospitable society and a welcoming culture.”
Gomez is a member of Opus Dei, and is clearly traditionalist in his approach, what some would call solidly conservative. But the above statement and Gomez’ consistent defense of the rights of immigrants show how tricky it can be to fit Catholics into the American political spectrum.
Posted: January 25, 2011 | Author: Mike | Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Abortion, March for Life |
On the 38th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision, and the 37th anniversary of the March for Life in Washington, questions about abortion and the pro-life movement were on our minds. In typical Millennial fashion, we hopped on G-chat tonight to talk it over. The questions remain and the answers are incomplete, especially in regards to how folks who are uncomfortable with the tone of the March can make a public stand with women and unborn children. Please join the conversation in the comments section.

Mike: In your first post, you talked about the MLK Day of Organizing you participated in last Monday. Fast forward a week to today, and we have the single biggest social demonstration for our generation of Catholics: the March for Life in Washington, DC. You and I have both been to the march, separately, but neither of us for a handful of years now. Reflecting on the day, and looking at the pro-life movement in general, what’s your take on the event?
Gen: It’s powerful to see tens of thousands of people make it to DC to take a stand against the legalization of abortion. And I think since I’m Catholic and I’ve made the trip with a Catholic group and hear about it in Catholic circles, I often forget that it’s not a Catholic event. It’s an event where people of different faith traditions, and no faith tradition at all, unite behind a common belief. It’s great that it happens.
But I’m not totally positive about the event, especially in the context of the “pro-life movement in general.” The “pro-life movement in general” has received a lot of criticism from Catholics and non-Catholics alike for being insensitive to say the least.
And my fear of the March for Life, is that it’s become a microcosm of the pro-life movement as a whole. I remember thinking that I was overwhelmed by the language of death (in signs and chants) during an event that’s supposed to promote a Culture of Life. I was really uncomfortable when I went, and I’m pro-life. I’m searching for a forum where I can be pro-life and not be uncomfortable with being pro-life.
Read the rest of this entry »
Recent Comments